Guido Liguori and Antonio Smargiassi
In philosophy it seems Manichaeism, in political sectarianism. In football, however it is called, simply, typhus. Because the fan can only add up Manichaeism and bigotry can not confuse that (its) part to the whole. Luigi Cavallaro, in its whole-Leninism (manifestolibri, pp. 142, € 15.00) - but more beautiful and alluring is the subtitle: The materialist conception of the area: short course - not least betraying these principles. The unhealthy partisanship of fans and the reasonable faction of the Communist spring up page after page, line after line. And even more exudes a genuine fascination with the butt of José Mourinho, revolutionary theory and practice, and the changing post-modern (for the role it attaches to the statement) drawn from the wake of "collectivism" of Helenio Herrera and "Bolshevism" by Arrigo Sacchi .
is not easy to talk about today, FC Internazionale, Lazio militants for two species as we are and we declare: after the controversy of recent days, mounted in usum Delphini, you risk being accused of "servant eulogy by the person who indulges in his usual "cowardly outrage." But there is no such risk that we will not discuss here the "beloved." The title is misleading and the book does not mention that apparently Inter. Rather, the systems of the football and their historical evolution. He speaks with language full of cultural references, entertaining and fun to propose a continuous return to the mutual cultural history and Marxism. Maybe sometimes difficult to understand for non experts (on the side of Marxism, of course).
The double bias that accompanies the work of Cavallaro makes it more intriguing for the passion and expertise you are showing, the critical reading and comparative evolution of football tactics. Not that all to yourself, of course. But cross the history of the method or system and the economy and the social sciences, or that the transition from man marking the area with the evolution political thought of the labor movement or social transformations of the twentieth century, is an effort that is fun and makes you think of a time.
said the intelligence and enjoyment of the text, let us now discuss the fundamental assumptions. Take for example two care author symmetries: one is that the division of labor among its own assembly line and division of roles in football of the '50s and '60s (free sweeping, a quarterback and that the stopper mark, the other quarterback that thins the median meetings, the wing tactics, etc..), the other the parallel between the world of work today is characterized by flexibility, adaptability of the worker, by the spread of general intellect , e il gioco a zona, con l'affermazione di un calciatore polivalente. In una linea che va per Cavallaro dalle teorie pienieristiche di Alfredo Di Stefano («Il calciatore del futuro deve essere in grado di ricoprire qualsiasi ruolo. Non può essere soltanto terzino, mediano o attaccante, ma deve incarnare il giocatore "a tutto tondo", che sa il fatto suo sia all'attacco che in difesa») al calcio all'olandese e poi al Milan di Sacchi, l'autore traduce nel linguaggio del football le riflessioni marxiane sul lavoratore che, liberato il/dal lavoro (come il calciatore dal giogo delle marcature fisse), «si appropria del suo essere onnilaterale in maniera onnilaterale», divenendo lavoratore (calciatore) «totale». As impressive, this symmetry seems pretty far-fetched. The football area redesigns roles, spaces, movements of the player, but does not eliminate the specialization of the players. It adds versatility, it does not remove the bias: Baresi, Maldini and Nesta are the best interpreters of the zone defense, but they have essentially played only one role in his career (two Maldini, maybe). The same goes for midfielders, Donadoni by Schneider, or the attackers, until Messi, Ibrahimovic and Cristiano Ronaldo.
We want to say football is a kick to area specialists for the same, more or less, based on calcium scoring in humans. Which leads us to investigate another of the central theses of Whole-Leninism : The scope of subversive represented entry into the Italian football scene in the duo-Berlusconi sacks. That is the dismantling of the golf game of every ideological interpretation of football as an activity based on the individual qualities of its interpreters. The thesis is controversial and it has been discussed by scholars of football Sacchi's Milan won due to the quality of its revolutionary new game, or the strength of the samples that we were playing? Everyone will keep their beliefs. It would, however, may focus on another issue: Berlusconi was the father of Italian NeoCalc. He has transformed the "existing relations of production" of the old football ours, but this process innovative, rather than in the tactics of bags, should be identified in the redefinition of the market economy and of our football. The television advertising, and then radically upset the material basis of an activity that henceforth will focus more on production than on the core sports. And, if you will, to the configuration of the universal player will contribute more to the end of the millennium "Bosman law" that the area, pressing or intensity preached by Sacchi. And after him by Mourinho. But prejudice
internal speech Cavallaro, shining representative of a well-established hermeneutic, we wonder: why in the book is totally missing the ring represented in this "genealogical tactics ", the" case Zeman? Perhaps because it is the most consistent incarnation of the most extreme examples and theoretical field of "total football", but it has also demonstrated - in the absence of worthy performers, that is, players who could put Berlusconi available - all the weakness practice? beautiful part, but, alas, zero tituli.
In philosophy it seems Manichaeism, in political sectarianism. In football, however it is called, simply, typhus. Because the fan can only add up Manichaeism and bigotry can not confuse that (its) part to the whole. Luigi Cavallaro, in its whole-Leninism (manifestolibri, pp. 142, € 15.00) - but more beautiful and alluring is the subtitle: The materialist conception of the area: short course - not least betraying these principles. The unhealthy partisanship of fans and the reasonable faction of the Communist spring up page after page, line after line. And even more exudes a genuine fascination with the butt of José Mourinho, revolutionary theory and practice, and the changing post-modern (for the role it attaches to the statement) drawn from the wake of "collectivism" of Helenio Herrera and "Bolshevism" by Arrigo Sacchi .
is not easy to talk about today, FC Internazionale, Lazio militants for two species as we are and we declare: after the controversy of recent days, mounted in usum Delphini, you risk being accused of "servant eulogy by the person who indulges in his usual "cowardly outrage." But there is no such risk that we will not discuss here the "beloved." The title is misleading and the book does not mention that apparently Inter. Rather, the systems of the football and their historical evolution. He speaks with language full of cultural references, entertaining and fun to propose a continuous return to the mutual cultural history and Marxism. Maybe sometimes difficult to understand for non experts (on the side of Marxism, of course).
The double bias that accompanies the work of Cavallaro makes it more intriguing for the passion and expertise you are showing, the critical reading and comparative evolution of football tactics. Not that all to yourself, of course. But cross the history of the method or system and the economy and the social sciences, or that the transition from man marking the area with the evolution political thought of the labor movement or social transformations of the twentieth century, is an effort that is fun and makes you think of a time.
said the intelligence and enjoyment of the text, let us now discuss the fundamental assumptions. Take for example two care author symmetries: one is that the division of labor among its own assembly line and division of roles in football of the '50s and '60s (free sweeping, a quarterback and that the stopper mark, the other quarterback that thins the median meetings, the wing tactics, etc..), the other the parallel between the world of work today is characterized by flexibility, adaptability of the worker, by the spread of general intellect , e il gioco a zona, con l'affermazione di un calciatore polivalente. In una linea che va per Cavallaro dalle teorie pienieristiche di Alfredo Di Stefano («Il calciatore del futuro deve essere in grado di ricoprire qualsiasi ruolo. Non può essere soltanto terzino, mediano o attaccante, ma deve incarnare il giocatore "a tutto tondo", che sa il fatto suo sia all'attacco che in difesa») al calcio all'olandese e poi al Milan di Sacchi, l'autore traduce nel linguaggio del football le riflessioni marxiane sul lavoratore che, liberato il/dal lavoro (come il calciatore dal giogo delle marcature fisse), «si appropria del suo essere onnilaterale in maniera onnilaterale», divenendo lavoratore (calciatore) «totale». As impressive, this symmetry seems pretty far-fetched. The football area redesigns roles, spaces, movements of the player, but does not eliminate the specialization of the players. It adds versatility, it does not remove the bias: Baresi, Maldini and Nesta are the best interpreters of the zone defense, but they have essentially played only one role in his career (two Maldini, maybe). The same goes for midfielders, Donadoni by Schneider, or the attackers, until Messi, Ibrahimovic and Cristiano Ronaldo.
We want to say football is a kick to area specialists for the same, more or less, based on calcium scoring in humans. Which leads us to investigate another of the central theses of Whole-Leninism : The scope of subversive represented entry into the Italian football scene in the duo-Berlusconi sacks. That is the dismantling of the golf game of every ideological interpretation of football as an activity based on the individual qualities of its interpreters. The thesis is controversial and it has been discussed by scholars of football Sacchi's Milan won due to the quality of its revolutionary new game, or the strength of the samples that we were playing? Everyone will keep their beliefs. It would, however, may focus on another issue: Berlusconi was the father of Italian NeoCalc. He has transformed the "existing relations of production" of the old football ours, but this process innovative, rather than in the tactics of bags, should be identified in the redefinition of the market economy and of our football. The television advertising, and then radically upset the material basis of an activity that henceforth will focus more on production than on the core sports. And, if you will, to the configuration of the universal player will contribute more to the end of the millennium "Bosman law" that the area, pressing or intensity preached by Sacchi. And after him by Mourinho. But prejudice
internal speech Cavallaro, shining representative of a well-established hermeneutic, we wonder: why in the book is totally missing the ring represented in this "genealogical tactics ", the" case Zeman? Perhaps because it is the most consistent incarnation of the most extreme examples and theoretical field of "total football", but it has also demonstrated - in the absence of worthy performers, that is, players who could put Berlusconi available - all the weakness practice? beautiful part, but, alas, zero tituli.
