blog by Alessandra Colla http://www.alessandracolla.net/?p=475 # comment-18484
Open Letter to Sir Robert
ANGELILLI (PPE - PDL), Mara BIZZOTTO (EFD - Northern League), Lara COMI (PPE - PDL), Elisabetta Gardini (PPE - PDL), Barbara Matera (PPE - PDL), Erminia Mazzoni (PPE - PDL), Licia RONZULLI (PPE - PDL), Amalia SARTORI ( PPE - PDL), This Mortal Coil (PPE - PDL) and Mr
Gabriele Albertini (EPP - PDL), Magdi Cristiano Allam (PPE - I love Italy) Antonella Antinori (PPE - UDC), Alfredo Antoniozzi (PPE - PDL), Pino ARLACCHI (ALDE - IDV), Raffaele Baldassarre (PPE - PDL), Sergio BERLATO (PPE - PDL), Luigi Berlinguer (S & D - PD ), Vito Bonsignore (PPE - PDL), Mario Borghezio (EFD - Northern League), Antonio CANCIAN (PPE - PDL), Carlo Casini (PPE - UDC), Sergio Gaetano COFFER (S & D - PD), John COLLINO (PPE - PDL), Paolo De Castro (S & D - PD), Luigi Ciriaco De Mita (PPE - UDC), Herbert DORFMANN (PPE - SVP), Carlo girlfriend (PPE - PDL), FONTANA Lorenzo (EFD - Northern League) Roberto Gualtieri (S & D - PD), Salvatore Iacolino (PPE - PDL), Vincenzo Iovine (ALDE - IDV), Giovanni La Via (PPE - PDL), Clemente Mastella (PPE - EDU), Mario Mauro (EPP - PDL), Claudio Morganti (EFD - Northern League), Alfredo BALL (PPE - PDL), Pier Antonio Panzeri ( S & D - PD), Aldo Patriciello (PPE - PDL), Mario Pirillo (S & D - PD), Gianni PITTELLA (S & D - PD), Vittorio Prodi (S & D - PD), Fiorello Provera (EFD - Northern League), Oreste Rossi (EFD - Northern League), Potito Salatto (PPE - PDL), Matteo Salvini (EFD - Northern League), David-Maria SASSOLI (S & D - PD), Giancarlo Scotti (EFD - Northern League) , Mark Scurr (PPE - PDL), Francesco Paolo Sergio Silvestris (PPE - PDL), Francesco Enrico Speroni (EFD - Northern League), Salvatore TATARELLA (PPE - PDL),
Ladies,
your names appear to seal the 86/609 European legislation on research or testing in vivo or vivisection.
is plausible, since you voted for, you'll read and follow the way of legislation, it is plausible, that is, whether you agree
• that the researcher is not obliged to use the substitute tests, even where they exist ;
• that the research does nothing to facilitate approval of these tests; •
that you give the green light to the creation of transgenic animals;
• the fact that there is a chance to experience several times on the same animal
• that there is a greater permissiveness in the experiment without the use of anesthesia and / or painkillers;
• the fact that you can experiment on primates (monkeys vulgar, even without special reasons) and stray dogs and cats (the latter is prohibited by the fineness in Italy Law 281/91 on stray dogs);
• the fact that we can experiment on live animals for teaching purposes ... The list
can continue, but limit ourselves to this.
So, if you have voted for all this, one must conclude that either consciously you agree with the decision to inflict death and suffering to other sentient beings for profit and not purely scientific, it is now amply demonstrated by a vast literature on, or you disagree unknowingly, because your understanding of the legislation does not account for at least thirty years of close multidisciplinary debate that involved biologists, lawyers, sociologists, philosophers, doctors and researchers, united by a common desire to deliver the in vivo experiments to a past that can not and should no longer affect the way we see - any more than Newtonian physics can and should influence the contemporary scientific research, now marked by the discoveries of quantum physics.
It follows that or try to disregard the suffering of other sentient beings, or do not know the matter of the litigation: without much circumlocution, and a little 'brutally, someone else in my place you would call evil or ignorant. In both cases, none of you, ladies and gentlemen, a good figure.
Remember, you and all those who think like you, that there is no need to love animals to respect them and protect them with the foresight, compassion and justice that our status of rational beings requires us. Regarded as objects to speculate on their suffering and their death is despicable and unworthy of a human person I know that someone invites you to shame. Not me, because I also know that should be ashamed for having a conscience ... But
not be afraid, ladies, some of you may thus lose my vote because I do not vote.
not vote because I will not run the risk of being officially represented by incompetent or superficial.
Your vote in favor of legislation 86/609 confirms me in the rightness of my choice: none of you, who demonstrated in facts to be neither sensitive nor prepared on topics such scientific, ethical and social deserves to represent me. With profound disrespect
Alessandra Colla
0 comments:
Post a Comment