The other day, the hairdresser (and where else?), Leafing through one of those who are named "women's magazines," he insertone run into a diktat on the designers for the winter starts.
Just the fact that someone who does not know me or not know how the think / how I live / how much money you have available to / etc where I live. can assume the right to tell me what should I wear to be attractive / desirable / etc winning. is something I've always hated the very young girl. But let us assume that there are people who need someone to explain what I think and what to choose now, it's people like these who turn the designers, who, this year, massively recommend the use and abuse of fur skins and various furs.
are sincere: If you see a lady over 70 wearing a coat of animal remains, I can not be indignant. I see her in a pathetic reflection of the terrible sixties, when enough wire and beads fur to give the illusion of being a lady. Then came the '68: and with it the eggs thrown at him the symbols of the worst bourgeoisie in the first La Scala, December 7 of that year. Hut was gone almost correct, then he is finished making the notary - as prophesied watching Ionesco's French students of May parade in his windows. It happens.
But I digress. Going back to what Fashion wants to impose on women, in this autumn-winter 2010/2011. Leather and fur products, we said, of all kinds - including deer, wolves and foxes, not to mention the usual mink, opossum, and so forth. I do not know if all the women of my kind who love to wear fragments of corpses know Leopold von Sacher-Masoch and seriously want to inspire his Venus im Pelz - what perhaps would give that kind of clothing some spiciness (but just maybe, huh?, because nowadays the most I am aware of spicy chili is the "kiss of Satan" - everything else is boring).
do not know, I said, if all my contemporary veneered dream of emulating the fatal Wanda, so in my eyes, I seem to victims dell'esiziale combination of ignorance / vulgarity which is the sum of these years bleak and desolate.
proof is the fact that, allow anyone to produce a luxury ragged, dogs and cats are skinned so ornarsene the Sabbath (but also to go to the grocery store under the house) because the fur seals are so trendy ... Of course these stupid they look good from 'go and see what is behind the hair that adorns (!) to market their rags . I think that should suffice for what they have on the stomach.
Then, however, there are also those that can or want to spend fabulous sums to go around in the mortal remains of those in the wild animals would be free, and instead admirable in our Western civilization have been convicted to a life of pain and anguish and to a horrible death to satisfy the vanity of ugly little woman frustrated or aspiring whores - and to line the pockets of designers: have you ever thought? Do you want to enrich their many clowns? De gustibus ...
But already: these silly creatures do not even care about human lives brought into play for a few little sberluccichìo 'carbon hardened risen to a status-symbol, let alone if they tremble for the fate of a beaver or fox. Or an otter, a leopard, a wolf, a deer, an opossum, a lynx and so on.
is why I support the inevitability di rendere edotto il consumatore su quel che accade negli allevamenti di animali da pelliccia, se necessario anche usandogli una dolce violenza, affinché comprenda a fondo di che cosa si rende complice con le sue smanie modaiole.
Che poi, signore mie, non vi si chiede di sottoporre le vostre sinapsi a chissà quale sforzo: tirate fuori un po’ di quel buonsenso che vi fa preferire un supermercato a un altro, e ragionate sul fatto che, non essendo noi a Oimjakon nell’inverno del 1926 , le molte fibre sintetiche (sottolineo “sintetiche”: il piumino d’oca lasciamolo addosso all’oca, che è meglio ) messe a nostra disposizione dalla moderna tecnologia are more than enough to avoid the risk of dying of cold.
I am perfectly aware that if the gentleman to whom I turn belong to the two above-mentioned categories sad no exhortation to make use of reason (who must have, somewhere) will scratch their convictions. If these skin and fur are an integral and essential clothing, whatever the cost (especially if they are not to pay in terms of pain and suffering), if they are fashion victims but if you prefer to look at 'be - well,' then there is nothing to be done.
Where not enough education, s’imporrebbe la rieducazione.
Vorrei vedere quel giorno.
Fonte: http://www.alessandracolla.net/?p=485
0 comments:
Post a Comment